Bonds Being Bonds Again, Who Knew?

Apr 10, 2023

For years bonds had a single job in portfolios, providing a ballast during periods of equity market weakness. Ok, maybe spin off a little income along the way. But most portfolios had been receiving as much or more of their income from equities, given yields were rather low. Then came 2022, and bonds didn’t just drop the ball – they fumbled, stumbled, and kicked the ball out of bounds. The TSX fell -5.8%, the S&P -18.1%, and Canadian bonds dropped by -11.8%.


For the past decade looking at rolling monthly returns for the TSX & Canadian bonds, there is no denying bonds have provided a good stabilizer for portfolios. Slicing the data to only those periods when the TSX declined, bonds, on average, were flat. Hence the stabilizer. But if you look at 2022 till the end of February this year, not so much of a stabilizer. During this period, when the market was down, it was down an average of -3.9%, and bonds were down an average of -1.2%. We don’t want to jinx it because one month does not make a trend, but March saw equities down and bonds up.

So, are bonds back to being bonds again? Maybe. March was an odd month with a bit of a market scare driven by fears over the impact of deposit flows on banks. Adding to this, the surprisingly strong economic data that had been the trend for the past few months has started to surprise a bit in the other direction. This was all good for bonds while not great for equities.


Forecasting correlations has got to be just about as hard as trying to forecast markets. But there are a few factors that tend to influence the bond/equity correlation over time. Correlations tend to be higher during periods of higher economic growth and lower when growth slows. Now if you are in the camp that the economy is slowing, as we are, then that favours lower correlations. 


The bigger impact is short-term rates. When central banks cut or raise rates, the correlation tends to be higher. Now we are not jumping to believe this is necessarily a causal relationship. Often when central banks are cutting rates, there is trouble in the markets or economy, which is a risk-off environment that naturally enjoys a strong negative correlation between equities and bonds. But when they raise rates, it increases the discount rate for the valuation of equities and bonds – helping them move in tandem.


So if we have seen peak rates (or if we are close), and if the economic temperature is cooling, bond/equity correlations should be lower than we have seen in the past year. The chart below captures the rolling 2-month correlation and slope between equities and bonds. Correlation gets most of the attention, but the size of the move matters too. Both have turned negative of late. 

Now, this could reverse for any number of reasons. First, if inflation re-accelerated or economic growth picks up, that certainly wouldn’t help. There is another buffer that helps bonds; namely, they now have a more attractive yield than years past. Perhaps one of the best charts we have come across to show this is from iShares. The chart below uses Bloomberg data to compile what percentage of the bond market trading with a 4% or better yield. It really highlights that yields today are simply back to more normal times, which is very different from the yield drought of the 2010s.

Final Thoughts


Inflation may not yet be over, and a recession is far from a certainty in the near term. However, the return of negative correlations between equities and bonds is a welcome change of events. The near-term sustainability of this relationship will depend on what lies ahead for the economy, risk appetite and, of course, the path of central banks. But with higher yields than years past and an increasing probability of a recession ahead, duration has quickly become a positive influence for portfolios.



— Craig Basinger is Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments




Source: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. and Purpose Investments Inc.


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Purpose Investments Inc. and are used by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. for information purposes only.


This report is authored by Craig Basinger, Chief Market Strategist, Purpose Investments Inc.


Disclaimers


Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. 


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author's judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them.


Purpose Investments Inc. 


Purpose Investments Inc. is a registered securities entity. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. 


Forward Looking Statements


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Neither Purpose Investments nor Echelon Partners warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to  update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional

advice. 


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. This is not an official publication or research report of either Echelon Partners or Purpose Investments, and this is not to be used as a solicitation in any jurisdiction. 


This document is not for public distribution, is for informational purposes only, and is not being delivered to you in the context of an offering of any securities, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security.

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

06 May, 2024
Take your pick. There is no shortage of both good and bad news floating about the financial markets. To be fair, this is always the case. The hard part is understanding which side is stronger today and which side will be stronger tomorrow. With markets up low to mid-single digits following a very strong Q4 finish to 2023, most would agree the optimists are carrying the day at the moment. It is not just rose-coloured glasses; there is good news out there. Economic growth signs or momentum appear to be improving year-to-date. Dial back a few quarters, and the U.S. economy remained resilient while other economies softened or were rather lacklustre, including Canada, Europe, Japan, and China, to highlight some of the biggies. Today, while Canada is struggling, momentum in the U.S. has moved even higher, and there are signs of improvement in most jurisdictions.
29 Apr, 2024
There are three things you should rarely ever bet against: the Leaf’s opposing team in the playoffs, the American consumer’s ability to spend, and corporate profits. As we are now about halfway through U.S. earnings season, once again, positive surprises remain the norm; 81% have beaten. It's a bit better than the 20-year average of 75%. The fact is that companies are good at managing analysts’ expectations. At least enough to beat them when the numbers hit the tape. The size of the positive surprises have been encouraging as well, at just under 10%. The highest surprise magnitude in some time.  One of our reservations on the sustainability of this market rally over the past couple of quarters has been the flat earnings revisions. In other words, global markets are up over 20% but earnings estimates have remained flat or tilted down slightly. More often than not, markets trend in the same direction as earnings revisions. Earnings get revised up when companies raise guidance and/or analysts become more encouraged about growth prospects. That is a good thing for markets. Obviously, downward revisions are bad. Yet estimates have remained very flat as markets marched higher, a challenging combination.
22 Apr, 2024
The oil market has been interesting lately and, to the surprise of many, has been the biggest silent outperformer this year. There is no shortage of geopolitical events to choose from that’s leading to a higher risk premium in oil with Brent breaking $90, whether it’s the Houthis missile attacks in the Red Sea leading to a massive re-route of trade, Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian refineries, and the latest escalation between Israel and Iran leading to some news outlets using WWIII as click bait-y headlines. Given the run-up in oil prices, Canadian oil equities have clearly benefitted from the much higher torque. But there is a layer of even better news: The Transmountain Expansion (TMX) continues to look to be in operation by May, which would lead to much better pricing on the Western Canadian Select (WCS). With the current setup for the oil markets, some key questions that we often get from investors are: How sustainable is the rally in Canadian energy names? To determine if the oil equities are overstretched, we can look at the debt-adjusted cash flow (DACF) multiples of the major integrated oil names and see how the valuation has shifted in light of the recent oil move. From Exhibit 1, the DACF multiples for the Canadian integrated have been fairly range-bound over the last year, also in line with WTI, which has been in the $70 - $85 range. As a starting point, we can infer that the valuations of the companies have been commensurate with the movements in the underlying oil price deck and in line with where the equities should trade in the cycle historically over the last couple of years. Typically, in the commodities cycle, higher prices are usually coupled with lower multiples as market participants will usually price in lower normalized prices and vice versa, so a cause of concern would be if valuation starts trending towards the 6.5x – 7.0x+ area if oil prices continue to stay in the upper bounds of the $70 - $90 range or higher.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: