Lift Off

The Echelon Insights Team • Mar 21, 2022

After months of jawboning and telegraphing the pending move, the world’s largest central bank finally raised rates. On Wednesday, March 16, the Fed raised the Fed Funds Rate from the emergency low of 0.25% to 0.50%, marking the first change in rates since cutting rates to rock-bottom levels in

response to the pandemic’s onset in March 2020. This rate hike follows recent moves by other central banks, including the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, to tighten monetary policy. 


One could argue that the Fed and other central banks are already behind the curve, given the global economy is growing at about 4%, unemployment is back down to near pre-pandemic levels, and inflation is, well, inflating. But knowing whether the banks are behind, just in time or ahead of the curve requires the passage of time. Monetary policy has a broad-based effect on the economy and asset prices, but it also takes time, making policy decisions and their timing very challenging.


How bond markets might react to the rate hike


If history is any indication, the onset of rate hikes is largely a non event. Looking back at the last seven Fed rate tightening periods, markets don’t seem to care all that much. Short yields, measured by the two-year Treasury, rise with most of the move in the early months. That is not surprising given the two-year is more influenced by the overnight rate. 


More interesting, is that longer yields such, as the 10-year, rise a little after the first-rate hike, but not by much. Intuitively, this makes sense. The bond market has lots of smart participants and reacts much quicker to economic data than the Fed’s official policy changes. Or more simply, the bond market usually knows rate hikes are coming and moves up (yield up, price down) ahead of time in anticipation. Given 10-year yields in the U.S. and Canada have risen from 0.7% in mid 2020 to 2.2% today, I’m pretty sure bonds knew this was coming.

The impact of rate hikes on equity markets


Equity markets, measured by the S&P 500, don’t seem to mind the Fed embarking on a rate hiking cycle. On average markets tend to be a bit more volatile for the first few months or so but then move higher. One reason for this is that the Fed typically raises rates because the economy is doing well enough to stand on its own two feet. Given that backdrop, the equity market tends to enjoy the lift from a good economy more than the drag effect from higher short-term rates. Looking out nine or 12 months, the picture is more clouded. If the risk of a recession mounts, the equity market does not fare as well. 


Admittedly, these are averages over seven occurrences over the past 40 years, so far from a hard rule. We should also consider the markets behaviour heading into the onset of a rate hiking period. This tightening cycle has already seen bond yields rise over the past 18 months. We have also seen equity markets enjoy strong gains since Q1 2020 followed by a corrective phase so far in 2022.

Rate hikes in an era of inflation 


The biggest unique variable for this rate hiking cycle is inflation. The last three hiking cycles were during periods of low and benign inflation—a considerable contrast with today. Rate hikes won’t address the supply chain issues still resonating from the pandemic nor the commodity spikes from the invasion of the Ukraine. Still, the inflation picture would become better if economic growth cooled faster, which rate hikes can help. Furthermore, given the inflation environment, we could be in for a more aggressive tightening cycle than recent experiences. 


Given the spike in commodity prices at the end of February and into March, inflation may well remain elevated longer than most expect. What will become just as topical in the coming months is the pace of economic growth deceleration. Slowing growth is pretty much ordained after the global economy rebounded by about 5.8% in 2021. Currently, consensus has this normalizing down to 4.0% in 2022 and the big question will be does this come down faster. We have already seen forecasts for 2022 cut from 4.5 to 4.0%, and safe to say not all forecasts have been adjusted following the onset of war and sanctions.

Investment Implications 


The global monetary tightening cycle has begun and will likely be with us for a while. It is about time. The current economic environment does not beget a zero-rate policy and leaving it this low for so long has at least partially contributed to the inflationary problem we are in today. 


Trying to draw similarities with this hiking cycle and previous episodes is challenging given the high inflation environment today. Furthermore, most past hiking cycles occurred during periods of accelerating economic growth while we are currently experiencing decelerating economic growth. 


The good news is the economy is decelerating from a high level, which means a few rate hikes are likely not going to move the needle very much. Still the pace of decelerating growth is key, and we are already starting to hear some banter about the ’R’ word. We think this is premature given the current economic growth pace, instead we are likely entering a few quarters of debate about a ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ landing. 


Short-term thought 


Markets have been rebounding this week and the correction may have run its course. We don’t have a scientific reason to say this other than the news continues to be negative. Ukraine conflict continues to devolve, the Fed hiked and based on comments plans to keep hiking for a long time, inflation prints were elevated, etc. The news has not been good. When bad news fails to move markets lower, the path of least resistance is likely up.

Source: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. and Purpose Investments Inc. 


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Purpose Investments Inc. and are used by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. for information purposes only. 


This report is authored by Craig Basinger, Chief Market Strategist, Purpose Investments Inc. 


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Purpose Investments Inc. and are used herein under a non-exclusive license by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) for information purposes only. The statements and statistics contained herein are based on material believed to be reliable but there is no guarantee they are accurate or complete. Particular investments or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual's objectives in consultation with their Echelon representative. 


Echelon Wealth Partners Ltd. 


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Ltd. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author's judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them. 


Purpose Investments Inc. 


Purpose Investments Inc. is a registered securities entity. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. 


Forward Looking Statements 


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Neither Purpose Investments nor Echelon Partners warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 

Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. 


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. This is not an official publication or research report of either Echelon Partners or Purpose Investments, and this is not to be used as a solicitation in any jurisdiction. 


This document is not for public distribution, is for informational purposes only, and is not being delivered to you in the context of an offering of any securities, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. 

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

06 May, 2024
Take your pick. There is no shortage of both good and bad news floating about the financial markets. To be fair, this is always the case. The hard part is understanding which side is stronger today and which side will be stronger tomorrow. With markets up low to mid-single digits following a very strong Q4 finish to 2023, most would agree the optimists are carrying the day at the moment. It is not just rose-coloured glasses; there is good news out there. Economic growth signs or momentum appear to be improving year-to-date. Dial back a few quarters, and the U.S. economy remained resilient while other economies softened or were rather lacklustre, including Canada, Europe, Japan, and China, to highlight some of the biggies. Today, while Canada is struggling, momentum in the U.S. has moved even higher, and there are signs of improvement in most jurisdictions.
29 Apr, 2024
There are three things you should rarely ever bet against: the Leaf’s opposing team in the playoffs, the American consumer’s ability to spend, and corporate profits. As we are now about halfway through U.S. earnings season, once again, positive surprises remain the norm; 81% have beaten. It's a bit better than the 20-year average of 75%. The fact is that companies are good at managing analysts’ expectations. At least enough to beat them when the numbers hit the tape. The size of the positive surprises have been encouraging as well, at just under 10%. The highest surprise magnitude in some time.  One of our reservations on the sustainability of this market rally over the past couple of quarters has been the flat earnings revisions. In other words, global markets are up over 20% but earnings estimates have remained flat or tilted down slightly. More often than not, markets trend in the same direction as earnings revisions. Earnings get revised up when companies raise guidance and/or analysts become more encouraged about growth prospects. That is a good thing for markets. Obviously, downward revisions are bad. Yet estimates have remained very flat as markets marched higher, a challenging combination.
22 Apr, 2024
The oil market has been interesting lately and, to the surprise of many, has been the biggest silent outperformer this year. There is no shortage of geopolitical events to choose from that’s leading to a higher risk premium in oil with Brent breaking $90, whether it’s the Houthis missile attacks in the Red Sea leading to a massive re-route of trade, Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian refineries, and the latest escalation between Israel and Iran leading to some news outlets using WWIII as click bait-y headlines. Given the run-up in oil prices, Canadian oil equities have clearly benefitted from the much higher torque. But there is a layer of even better news: The Transmountain Expansion (TMX) continues to look to be in operation by May, which would lead to much better pricing on the Western Canadian Select (WCS). With the current setup for the oil markets, some key questions that we often get from investors are: How sustainable is the rally in Canadian energy names? To determine if the oil equities are overstretched, we can look at the debt-adjusted cash flow (DACF) multiples of the major integrated oil names and see how the valuation has shifted in light of the recent oil move. From Exhibit 1, the DACF multiples for the Canadian integrated have been fairly range-bound over the last year, also in line with WTI, which has been in the $70 - $85 range. As a starting point, we can infer that the valuations of the companies have been commensurate with the movements in the underlying oil price deck and in line with where the equities should trade in the cycle historically over the last couple of years. Typically, in the commodities cycle, higher prices are usually coupled with lower multiples as market participants will usually price in lower normalized prices and vice versa, so a cause of concern would be if valuation starts trending towards the 6.5x – 7.0x+ area if oil prices continue to stay in the upper bounds of the $70 - $90 range or higher.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: