Good News, Good News, and More Good News

May 15, 2023

Over the past few weeks, we would say the news has been tilted solidly towards the ‘good’ side. The world’s largest central bank (Fed) effectively announced the cessation of rate hikes, ending a fourteen-month journey that raised overnight rates from 0.25% to 5.25%. Yay!!!


Q1 earnings season is wrapping up, and it finished stronger than it began. With over 90% of companies having reported, 77% surprised to the upside, with an average magnitude of 6.5%. We have not seen that large of a surprise in a couple of years. Of course, you could be bearish and point out that Q1 earnings had been almost $60, and forecasts fell over the past few months to just over $50. So the surprises were against some rather low forecasts. Nonetheless, the earnings season finished well. Yay!!!


Inflation has improved. The US reported April CPI data that continued to show signs of improvement. It was the first year-over-year print below 5% in the past two years, at 4.9%. Yay!!!


Labour remains resilient in both Canada and the US. Of course, this is a double-edged sword as too much good news would be inflationary, but a strong report for both Canada and the US, including solid gains in higher-paying jobs, is good news for the economy. At least showing recession risk as not being imminent. Yay!!!


Sure, there is some not-so-good news as well. Consumer confidence moved lower, the debt ceiling remains top of mind, and the US regional bank stresses remain. But taken as a whole, the news of the past couple of weeks has been good. One would expect this preponderance of good news to lift the market higher, but that hasn’t happened. The daily gyrations have been up and down, but overall, markets are down slightly in May so far. The S&P and TSX are both off a minor 1%.


When good news fails to lift markets higher, Mr. Market is saying something and we should all listen. In the near term, the path of least resistance may be to the downside.


Debt Ceiling


We have a history of rarely weighing in on politics for a few reasons. One, we believe the economy is usually a bigger deal than any change in policy. Of course, there are exceptions to this, but it is a good general rule. Secondly, good luck trying to guess the likely path of policy decisions, as what should be done for the markets/economy is often confounded by ideological views. Thirdly, even if you ‘guess’ right as to what the policy, announcement or outcome may be, how the market reacts is equally challenging and often surprising.


Take the debt ceiling debate. We feel confident it will be raised, but how we get there is a guess. Maybe it will be resolved quickly without any disruption. That is our base case, remembering back to the last time this became a tenacious topic over a decade ago. The government started to shut down, which impacted people who voted, resulting in a drop in support for the party viewed as the blocker. Neither party likes to lose votes.

A debt ceiling resolution would certainly be good news, and perhaps markets would react positively. BUT, that may be short-lived. The markets for much of the past few years have been very sensitive to the amount of stimulus. During periods of more stimulus, equity markets have advanced, and during periods of dwindling stimulus, markets have fallen. The above chart highlights this relationship. While not a perfect fit, directionally, it is very strong.


Stimulus is a combination of measurements that really center around the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. Most are aware of the expansion of Fed assets as a quantitative stimulus tool at their disposal. The stimulus we track includes this and also incorporates the Repo market and General Account. The Repo market is a kind of parking spot for excess liquidity for banks and other institutions. Effectively it is money being diverted out of the economy/markets and being re-deposited with central banks. So the size of the Repo market is subtracted from the total stimulus.


The interesting component of the debt ceiling is the General Account. Think of this as the government’s chequing account. If they write cheques to consumers or businesses or for projects, this is stimulus back into the economy, and the account goes down. That is why the account is subtracted from the stimulus. So if the account gets smaller, that is stimulus. And it sure has gotten smaller. 

With the debt ceiling looming, the General Account has been bled almost dry. So what will happen when the debt ceiling is raised? Well, the government will likely replenish this account by issuing Treasuries. As investors buy those Treasuries, money/liquidity/stimulus will be removed from the markets. So that aqua line in the first chart will likely move lower. And what about the other assets on the Fed’s balance sheet? Well, the Fed has continued to reduce their asset holdings, combining for potentially an even bigger drop in the total stimulus.


This is a simplified lens into central bank balance sheets regarding the ebb and flow of stimulus. And we have omitted the stimulus provided to banks via Primary Credit Loans and the Bank Term Funding Program. Both of which exploded in size as US regional banks rushed to replace fleeing deposits. Technically this is a stimulus not captured in our framework. But that is because we do not believe banks using these programs are rushing out to inject that money into the economy via loans or investments. Most banks are becoming increasingly tight on lending, given the uncertainty of their deposit base.


Final Thoughts


A resolution to the debt ceiling will be good news since no resolution is really bad news. But it may not prove to be a lasting panacea for the markets as it could trigger less stimulus in the weeks or months afterwards. So once again, even this good news may do little to lift markets higher.



— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Source: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. and Purpose Investments Inc.


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Purpose Investments Inc. and are used by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. for information purposes only.


This report is authored by Craig Basinger, Chief Market Strategist, Purpose Investments Inc.


Disclaimers


Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. 


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author's judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them.


Purpose Investments Inc. 


Purpose Investments Inc. is a registered securities entity. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. 


Forward Looking Statements


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Neither Purpose Investments nor Echelon Partners warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to  update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional

advice. 


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. This is not an official publication or research report of either Echelon Partners or Purpose Investments, and this is not to be used as a solicitation in any jurisdiction. 


This document is not for public distribution, is for informational purposes only, and is not being delivered to you in the context of an offering of any securities, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security.

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

06 May, 2024
Take your pick. There is no shortage of both good and bad news floating about the financial markets. To be fair, this is always the case. The hard part is understanding which side is stronger today and which side will be stronger tomorrow. With markets up low to mid-single digits following a very strong Q4 finish to 2023, most would agree the optimists are carrying the day at the moment. It is not just rose-coloured glasses; there is good news out there. Economic growth signs or momentum appear to be improving year-to-date. Dial back a few quarters, and the U.S. economy remained resilient while other economies softened or were rather lacklustre, including Canada, Europe, Japan, and China, to highlight some of the biggies. Today, while Canada is struggling, momentum in the U.S. has moved even higher, and there are signs of improvement in most jurisdictions.
29 Apr, 2024
There are three things you should rarely ever bet against: the Leaf’s opposing team in the playoffs, the American consumer’s ability to spend, and corporate profits. As we are now about halfway through U.S. earnings season, once again, positive surprises remain the norm; 81% have beaten. It's a bit better than the 20-year average of 75%. The fact is that companies are good at managing analysts’ expectations. At least enough to beat them when the numbers hit the tape. The size of the positive surprises have been encouraging as well, at just under 10%. The highest surprise magnitude in some time.  One of our reservations on the sustainability of this market rally over the past couple of quarters has been the flat earnings revisions. In other words, global markets are up over 20% but earnings estimates have remained flat or tilted down slightly. More often than not, markets trend in the same direction as earnings revisions. Earnings get revised up when companies raise guidance and/or analysts become more encouraged about growth prospects. That is a good thing for markets. Obviously, downward revisions are bad. Yet estimates have remained very flat as markets marched higher, a challenging combination.
22 Apr, 2024
The oil market has been interesting lately and, to the surprise of many, has been the biggest silent outperformer this year. There is no shortage of geopolitical events to choose from that’s leading to a higher risk premium in oil with Brent breaking $90, whether it’s the Houthis missile attacks in the Red Sea leading to a massive re-route of trade, Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian refineries, and the latest escalation between Israel and Iran leading to some news outlets using WWIII as click bait-y headlines. Given the run-up in oil prices, Canadian oil equities have clearly benefitted from the much higher torque. But there is a layer of even better news: The Transmountain Expansion (TMX) continues to look to be in operation by May, which would lead to much better pricing on the Western Canadian Select (WCS). With the current setup for the oil markets, some key questions that we often get from investors are: How sustainable is the rally in Canadian energy names? To determine if the oil equities are overstretched, we can look at the debt-adjusted cash flow (DACF) multiples of the major integrated oil names and see how the valuation has shifted in light of the recent oil move. From Exhibit 1, the DACF multiples for the Canadian integrated have been fairly range-bound over the last year, also in line with WTI, which has been in the $70 - $85 range. As a starting point, we can infer that the valuations of the companies have been commensurate with the movements in the underlying oil price deck and in line with where the equities should trade in the cycle historically over the last couple of years. Typically, in the commodities cycle, higher prices are usually coupled with lower multiples as market participants will usually price in lower normalized prices and vice versa, so a cause of concern would be if valuation starts trending towards the 6.5x – 7.0x+ area if oil prices continue to stay in the upper bounds of the $70 - $90 range or higher.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: