Gold has lost some of its mojo

The Echelon Insights Team • Jul 26, 2021

There is a large cohort of investors that loves gold, and a large cohort that dislikes gold; we are neither. Our opinion on the yellow metal and gold mining companies changes over time. This is evident in gold allocation in our fundamentally driven North American dividend-focused portfolio over the past five years, from less than 3% to over 9% and currently sitting at 7%. The gold weighting in the TSX also has seen some pretty big swings, ranging from less than 3% to over 16% over the past 15 years (Chart 1). That is a pretty big swing for one of the larger components of the index. 

The reason we decided to discuss gold in this week’s edition is that we are seeing some odd pricing behaviour in the yellow metal of late. The price of gold is often heavily influenced by a number of factors, including: 


  1. Inflation – since gold is a real asset, it is often viewed as a hedge against inflation. Higher inflation, higher gold. 
  2. Nominal yields – given gold has no distribution, higher nominal yields on government bonds makes that competing defensive asset class relatively more attractive. High yields, lower gold.
  3. U.S. dollar hedge – Gold is quoted in USD, so a falling USD is typically positive for gold prices. Lower USD, higher gold. 
  4. Trust – gold often does well as a hedge against uncertainty, including trust in the financial system. Lower trust, higher gold. 


There are other factors as well. Bitcoin has become a competing asset class to some degree for those desiring a non-fiat currency alternative. Central bank buying or selling gold, flows into gold ETFs, consumer demand especially from developing economies … the list goes on. But the four we listed are usually big and more consistent factors. 


To make matters a bit more complex, the influence of these factors changes over time. For instance, sometimes gold reacts to inflation but ignores currency or nominal yield moves. Sometimes currency moves matter the most for gold, and other factors don’t matter. Nobody ever said investing would be easy. 


Gold misbehaving 

Real yields, which is the nominal 10-year U.S. Treasury yield less inflation, captures both nominal yields and inflation factors listed above. There has been a very strong connection between gold bullion prices and real yields for the past decade. In addition, peaks and troughs in real yields have often coincided with troughs and peaks in gold prices going back to the 1970s (Chart 2). Turning points in the direction of real yields has marked turning points in gold. Plus, when real yields are trending in one direction, gold is often trending in the opposite [note: real yields are inverted in the charts]. 

This relationship has been very strong in the past few years (Chart 3). However, the recent drop in real yields (see rise in the purple line) due to rising inflation and falling nominal yields has not been reciprocated by a rise in gold. Ok, perhaps the gold market also buys into the view that this inflation impulse we are experiencing is 100% transitory. However, gold should have also risen as 10-year nominal yields fell from 1.7% to 1.3%. But it didn’t. That has us worried that the path of least resistance for gold may be lower from here out. 

For the other factors we are not sure how to measure ‘trust’ in the system, but we will point out that currency appears to be having a stronger influence on gold in the past few months. Normally, when the U.S. dollar declines, gold rises and vice versa. This relationship has been very soft or even moving against the norm since 2019 and into early 2021, for the most part. Gold started rising in 2019 despite a rising USD. In late 2020, gold continued to rise as the USD started to weaken (normal), but the USD continued to weaken and gold reversed course. The past few months though, we have seen them moving in opposite directions again (Chart 4). 

Investment Implications 

If you believe this bout of inflation is temporary and/or bond yields are set to rise, gold will likely suffer from headwinds for a while. We believe this situation may persist in the near term. Afterwards, our expectations are for inflation to settle at a higher level than the market is expecting, which should be positive for gold. From a currency protection perspective, we welcome the return of a strong negative correlation between gold and the USD. Overall, we are still constructive on gold for a portfolio diversifier but with a more sombre view in the coming months.

Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. unless otherwise noted.


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Richardson Wealth Limited and are used herein under a non-exclusive license by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) for information purposes only. The statements and statistics contained herein are based on material believed to be reliable but there is no guarantee they are accurate or complete. Particular investments or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual's objectives in consultation with their Echelon representative. 


Forward Looking Statements


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”), its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of its author, Richardson Wealth Limited (“Richardson”), used under a non-exclusive license and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) or its affiliates.


This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete.


Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Echelon and Richardson do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. 

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

06 May, 2024
Take your pick. There is no shortage of both good and bad news floating about the financial markets. To be fair, this is always the case. The hard part is understanding which side is stronger today and which side will be stronger tomorrow. With markets up low to mid-single digits following a very strong Q4 finish to 2023, most would agree the optimists are carrying the day at the moment. It is not just rose-coloured glasses; there is good news out there. Economic growth signs or momentum appear to be improving year-to-date. Dial back a few quarters, and the U.S. economy remained resilient while other economies softened or were rather lacklustre, including Canada, Europe, Japan, and China, to highlight some of the biggies. Today, while Canada is struggling, momentum in the U.S. has moved even higher, and there are signs of improvement in most jurisdictions.
29 Apr, 2024
There are three things you should rarely ever bet against: the Leaf’s opposing team in the playoffs, the American consumer’s ability to spend, and corporate profits. As we are now about halfway through U.S. earnings season, once again, positive surprises remain the norm; 81% have beaten. It's a bit better than the 20-year average of 75%. The fact is that companies are good at managing analysts’ expectations. At least enough to beat them when the numbers hit the tape. The size of the positive surprises have been encouraging as well, at just under 10%. The highest surprise magnitude in some time.  One of our reservations on the sustainability of this market rally over the past couple of quarters has been the flat earnings revisions. In other words, global markets are up over 20% but earnings estimates have remained flat or tilted down slightly. More often than not, markets trend in the same direction as earnings revisions. Earnings get revised up when companies raise guidance and/or analysts become more encouraged about growth prospects. That is a good thing for markets. Obviously, downward revisions are bad. Yet estimates have remained very flat as markets marched higher, a challenging combination.
22 Apr, 2024
The oil market has been interesting lately and, to the surprise of many, has been the biggest silent outperformer this year. There is no shortage of geopolitical events to choose from that’s leading to a higher risk premium in oil with Brent breaking $90, whether it’s the Houthis missile attacks in the Red Sea leading to a massive re-route of trade, Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian refineries, and the latest escalation between Israel and Iran leading to some news outlets using WWIII as click bait-y headlines. Given the run-up in oil prices, Canadian oil equities have clearly benefitted from the much higher torque. But there is a layer of even better news: The Transmountain Expansion (TMX) continues to look to be in operation by May, which would lead to much better pricing on the Western Canadian Select (WCS). With the current setup for the oil markets, some key questions that we often get from investors are: How sustainable is the rally in Canadian energy names? To determine if the oil equities are overstretched, we can look at the debt-adjusted cash flow (DACF) multiples of the major integrated oil names and see how the valuation has shifted in light of the recent oil move. From Exhibit 1, the DACF multiples for the Canadian integrated have been fairly range-bound over the last year, also in line with WTI, which has been in the $70 - $85 range. As a starting point, we can infer that the valuations of the companies have been commensurate with the movements in the underlying oil price deck and in line with where the equities should trade in the cycle historically over the last couple of years. Typically, in the commodities cycle, higher prices are usually coupled with lower multiples as market participants will usually price in lower normalized prices and vice versa, so a cause of concern would be if valuation starts trending towards the 6.5x – 7.0x+ area if oil prices continue to stay in the upper bounds of the $70 - $90 range or higher.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: