Fall in Love with these Income Splitting Tips for you and your Spouse

Feb 14, 2024

Want to make the most of your savings in retirement with your married or common-law spouse? The trick here is not knowing to save, but knowing how to save. Which accounts make sense?


(Keep in mind, we're just going to cover the basics here…but if you need help, your advisor is just a call away.)


Spousal RRSPs


RRSPs are a popular retirement savings vehicle for many Canadians. Can you contribute to your spouse’s account? Sort of – but not exactly.


You can’t contribute to a spouse’s individual RRSP. That’s a no-no, leading to potential attribution penalties coming by way of a CRA audit.


But here’s the trick: you can contribute to a Spousal RRSP. And there might be a very good reason to do that.


Don’t think that 50 percent pension splitting is enough to fully split retirement income for you and your spouse? Is your employment and future retirement income expected to be significantly higher than your spouse’s? Or vice-versa? That’s when contributions to a Spousal RRSP could be a good idea.


Zakk and Ella show how income splitting with Spousal RRSPs works


Let’s imagine a nice, happy 30-ish couple, Zakk and Ella. They’re both gainfully employed and doing well for themselves, though their incomes are a little mismatched. After stints tending bar and running a coffee shop, Zakk finally followed his calling two years ago and became an art teacher at Ridgemont High.


He earns $60,000. Meanwhile, Ella has been working continuously for 10 years as a software developer with a growing tech company. After raises most years, she now earns $90,000.


Ella is the higher earner. After paying off debt and expenses, she contributes $12,000 to a Spousal RRSP for her husband, Zakk.


Ella deducts the RRSP contribution from her income and that $12,000 contribution reduces her personal annual RRSP contribution limit. That would help her get a tax refund, or at least lower the taxes that she pays that year.


In this case, because Zakk is the lower-income spouse, he is the person authorized to withdraw the funds from the RRSP. However, there is a little bit of a complication…


If you want to take out that money to use it, here comes the tax man! How do you deal with that?


How withdrawals from Spousal RRSPs get taxed


Zakk wants to make a withdrawal from the Spousal RRSP. Let’s say that his withdrawal is equal to or less than contributions Ella made in the year of withdrawal or two preceding calendar years.


In that case, the CRA will tax the withdrawal amount back to the contributor, Ella. But Zakk won’t get taxed, even though (as the lower-income spouse) he is the official holder of the Spousal RRSP (probably the lower-income spouse).


Let’s take a different case: Zakk wants to make a withdrawal from the Spousal RRSP, but Ella hasn’t made a contribution that year or in the preceding two years. In that case, he’ll be taxed on that income.


There are exceptions where the spousal attribution rule wouldn’t apply, such as if Ella died the year the funds were being withdrawn. It also wouldn’t apply if Zakk and Ella became non-residents. There are a few other technical exceptions, so if you're using this strategy, best to chat with your advisor.


Now, Spousal RRSPs aren’t the be-all, end-all of income splitting strategies. There is also…


Pension Income Splitting


You can transfer up to 50 percent of eligible pension income to your spouse. However, there’s a catch.


Eligible pension income is different when you’re under 65 than when you’re over 65. Here’s how:


Before 65, pension income splitting is limited to:

  • Lifetime annuity payments from a registered pension plan (eg. monthly payments from a private pension)
  • Certain death benefits


65 and over, pension income splitting includes:


The same stuff as above, plus payments from:

  • RRIF
  • Deferred Profit Sharing Program (DPSP)


For most Canadians, this up-to 50 percent splitting is usually enough to split couples’ retirement incomes to maximum efficiency. But maybe one spouse’s income is so high that there is still a gap? Well, there are other strategies…


Splitting your CPP


Splitting your CPP is not terribly common (we’ll explain why, below) but here’s an example of how it could work.


Let’s go back to the case of Zakk and Ella (many years later). When Ella took time off to raise their children (and even after she went back to work part-time), Zakk became the higher income earner. Now that he is retired, he is entitled to about $12,000 a year from CPP. Ella didn’t contribute as much and now is expecting only $6,000 a year from CPP. By sharing CPP credits, Zakk and Ella could lower their total tax bill.


We’re including this just to be comprehensive… but just to be clear, while it might work for Zakk and Ella, for many Canadians, this might not be worth the trouble. Your maximum CPP payment might only be around $1,100 a month, each. The tax savings on that income could be meagre. But hey, if you’re on a limited income in retirement, every dollar counts.


Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA)


While this is not specifically an account that couples could use directly for income splitting, the TFSA can be part of anyone’s comprehensive retirement income strategy. And certainly, in cases where there is a big disparity of incomes, it may be better to draw income from this in retirement, instead of paying tax on drawn income from other types of accounts.


You can gift money to your spouse or common-law partner, who would then put it into their TFSA account. (You can’t ordinarily directly contribute the money into their account – but if it’s coming from a joint bank account, it won’t matter).


There are no tax consequences to withdrawing that money… so, make sure it’s at least considered for your overall long-term strategy. Reposted with permission from CI Direct Investing.

Source: Charts are sourced to https://www.thelinkbetween.ca/


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by The Link Between (https://www.thelinkbetween.ca/) and are used by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. for information purposes only.


Disclaimers


Echelon Wealth Partners Inc.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author's judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them.

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

06 May, 2024
Take your pick. There is no shortage of both good and bad news floating about the financial markets. To be fair, this is always the case. The hard part is understanding which side is stronger today and which side will be stronger tomorrow. With markets up low to mid-single digits following a very strong Q4 finish to 2023, most would agree the optimists are carrying the day at the moment. It is not just rose-coloured glasses; there is good news out there. Economic growth signs or momentum appear to be improving year-to-date. Dial back a few quarters, and the U.S. economy remained resilient while other economies softened or were rather lacklustre, including Canada, Europe, Japan, and China, to highlight some of the biggies. Today, while Canada is struggling, momentum in the U.S. has moved even higher, and there are signs of improvement in most jurisdictions.
29 Apr, 2024
There are three things you should rarely ever bet against: the Leaf’s opposing team in the playoffs, the American consumer’s ability to spend, and corporate profits. As we are now about halfway through U.S. earnings season, once again, positive surprises remain the norm; 81% have beaten. It's a bit better than the 20-year average of 75%. The fact is that companies are good at managing analysts’ expectations. At least enough to beat them when the numbers hit the tape. The size of the positive surprises have been encouraging as well, at just under 10%. The highest surprise magnitude in some time.  One of our reservations on the sustainability of this market rally over the past couple of quarters has been the flat earnings revisions. In other words, global markets are up over 20% but earnings estimates have remained flat or tilted down slightly. More often than not, markets trend in the same direction as earnings revisions. Earnings get revised up when companies raise guidance and/or analysts become more encouraged about growth prospects. That is a good thing for markets. Obviously, downward revisions are bad. Yet estimates have remained very flat as markets marched higher, a challenging combination.
22 Apr, 2024
The oil market has been interesting lately and, to the surprise of many, has been the biggest silent outperformer this year. There is no shortage of geopolitical events to choose from that’s leading to a higher risk premium in oil with Brent breaking $90, whether it’s the Houthis missile attacks in the Red Sea leading to a massive re-route of trade, Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian refineries, and the latest escalation between Israel and Iran leading to some news outlets using WWIII as click bait-y headlines. Given the run-up in oil prices, Canadian oil equities have clearly benefitted from the much higher torque. But there is a layer of even better news: The Transmountain Expansion (TMX) continues to look to be in operation by May, which would lead to much better pricing on the Western Canadian Select (WCS). With the current setup for the oil markets, some key questions that we often get from investors are: How sustainable is the rally in Canadian energy names? To determine if the oil equities are overstretched, we can look at the debt-adjusted cash flow (DACF) multiples of the major integrated oil names and see how the valuation has shifted in light of the recent oil move. From Exhibit 1, the DACF multiples for the Canadian integrated have been fairly range-bound over the last year, also in line with WTI, which has been in the $70 - $85 range. As a starting point, we can infer that the valuations of the companies have been commensurate with the movements in the underlying oil price deck and in line with where the equities should trade in the cycle historically over the last couple of years. Typically, in the commodities cycle, higher prices are usually coupled with lower multiples as market participants will usually price in lower normalized prices and vice versa, so a cause of concern would be if valuation starts trending towards the 6.5x – 7.0x+ area if oil prices continue to stay in the upper bounds of the $70 - $90 range or higher.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: