Crowding Out Risk

Oct 10, 2023

Now, that was a blockbuster jobs report. The U.S. economy added 336k jobs in September, based on the nonfarm payroll report, which was much stronger than expected. Plus, the last two months were revised higher by 119k. This was a strong labour report (or labor as they like to spell it in America). There were almost 100k jobs in leisure/hospitality and education/health, with +70k, was also a big contributor. As was government at +73k, bringing total government employees above pre-pandemic levels—we will touch on deficits below. Canada, too, enjoyed strong labour gains at +64k. Jobs for everyone, it seems, are still on.



In response, bond yields have jumped higher yet again. At the time of writing, the U.S. 10-year Treasury is now yielding 4.8%, up a full percentage point since mid-July on what appears to be a relentless climb to who knows where. It is not just America; yields have been climbing in Canada, Europe, and the list goes on. The yield gains are larger in North America, but in the past few weeks, the other major markets are hopping on the trend.

So, you are telling me I can lock in a 10-year annualized return of 4.8% by owning a U.S. Treasury or 4.2% for a Canada Govie? That certainly makes for a more constructive financial plan if my portfolio target is somewhere in the 6-7% range. Of course, it wouldn’t be a straight line, but if more end-point-focused, it certainly has an appeal. As does 5% yields on money market or shorter-term vehicles. Clearly appealing yields, looking at investor behaviour this year as money has piled into money market vehicles. Based on ICI data from the U.S., money market assets have increased from $4.7 to $5.7 trillion so far this year, following a similar trend in Canada, albeit of a smaller magnitude.


Here lies the problem. The U.S. government is expected to run a $1.5 trillion deficit in 2023, which is forecast to rise to $2.8 trillion over the next decade. During the pandemic, when the deficit was an astonishing $3.1 trillion, it was largely funded by the central bank buying bonds and expanding its balance sheet. One hand helping the other. But that is no longer the case as QE has become QT, meaning the balance sheet is shrinking. International Treasury buying is also declining as other central banks, such as China and Japan, are simply less enthusiastic buyers compared to years past. 

And then there are the banks. U.S. banks have been buyers of Treasuries in years past. But with short rates so high and unrealized losses on their existing bond holdings (expect to hear more about that in the upcoming earnings season), let’s just say they, too, are not enthusiastic about buying more Treasuries, especially with such a low carry. So, it's up to the private sector, which so far has been a willing buyer given money flows lured by the higher yields. But if you and I are the new buyers of government debt to fund deficits, that means our capital is not going into corporate investments as much. This is what crowding out of private investment looks like. And while it is no surprise to anyone, a dollar given to the government does not have the same economic benefit as a dollar given to a corporation.


Taken all together, the money supply has been shrinking, yields have moved higher, and now credit spreads are rising. That means financial conditions are tightening at an increasing pace. Monetary policy is a blunt instrument that works on a delay, it is starting to bite more and more. It is worth pointing out that a sudden move like this in financial conditions is unsettling.

Final Thoughts


The cost of capital is real again, and it is a lot higher than it has been in years. Plus, it is not as plentiful, exacerbated by more private capital going to government spending. This isn’t all doom and gloom. In fact, it is probably healthier. Unfortunately, after so many years of low-cost capital and tons of excess liquidity sloshing about the world, the adjustment is likely a long process. Which will continue to see big market moves, like down in 2022 and up in the 1H of 2023. We remained cautious on the 2H of 2023.



— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments




Source: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. and Purpose Investments Inc.


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Purpose Investments Inc. and are used by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. for information purposes only.


This report is authored by Craig Basinger, Chief Market Strategist, Purpose Investments Inc. 


Disclaimers


Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. 


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author's judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them.


Purpose Investments Inc. 


Purpose Investments Inc. is a registered securities entity. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. 


Forward Looking Statements


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Neither Purpose Investments nor Echelon Partners warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to  update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional

advice. 


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. This is not an official publication or research report of either Echelon Partners or Purpose Investments, and this is not to be used as a solicitation in any jurisdiction. 


This document is not for public distribution, is for informational purposes only, and is not being delivered to you in the context of an offering of any securities, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security.

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

06 May, 2024
Take your pick. There is no shortage of both good and bad news floating about the financial markets. To be fair, this is always the case. The hard part is understanding which side is stronger today and which side will be stronger tomorrow. With markets up low to mid-single digits following a very strong Q4 finish to 2023, most would agree the optimists are carrying the day at the moment. It is not just rose-coloured glasses; there is good news out there. Economic growth signs or momentum appear to be improving year-to-date. Dial back a few quarters, and the U.S. economy remained resilient while other economies softened or were rather lacklustre, including Canada, Europe, Japan, and China, to highlight some of the biggies. Today, while Canada is struggling, momentum in the U.S. has moved even higher, and there are signs of improvement in most jurisdictions.
29 Apr, 2024
There are three things you should rarely ever bet against: the Leaf’s opposing team in the playoffs, the American consumer’s ability to spend, and corporate profits. As we are now about halfway through U.S. earnings season, once again, positive surprises remain the norm; 81% have beaten. It's a bit better than the 20-year average of 75%. The fact is that companies are good at managing analysts’ expectations. At least enough to beat them when the numbers hit the tape. The size of the positive surprises have been encouraging as well, at just under 10%. The highest surprise magnitude in some time.  One of our reservations on the sustainability of this market rally over the past couple of quarters has been the flat earnings revisions. In other words, global markets are up over 20% but earnings estimates have remained flat or tilted down slightly. More often than not, markets trend in the same direction as earnings revisions. Earnings get revised up when companies raise guidance and/or analysts become more encouraged about growth prospects. That is a good thing for markets. Obviously, downward revisions are bad. Yet estimates have remained very flat as markets marched higher, a challenging combination.
22 Apr, 2024
The oil market has been interesting lately and, to the surprise of many, has been the biggest silent outperformer this year. There is no shortage of geopolitical events to choose from that’s leading to a higher risk premium in oil with Brent breaking $90, whether it’s the Houthis missile attacks in the Red Sea leading to a massive re-route of trade, Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian refineries, and the latest escalation between Israel and Iran leading to some news outlets using WWIII as click bait-y headlines. Given the run-up in oil prices, Canadian oil equities have clearly benefitted from the much higher torque. But there is a layer of even better news: The Transmountain Expansion (TMX) continues to look to be in operation by May, which would lead to much better pricing on the Western Canadian Select (WCS). With the current setup for the oil markets, some key questions that we often get from investors are: How sustainable is the rally in Canadian energy names? To determine if the oil equities are overstretched, we can look at the debt-adjusted cash flow (DACF) multiples of the major integrated oil names and see how the valuation has shifted in light of the recent oil move. From Exhibit 1, the DACF multiples for the Canadian integrated have been fairly range-bound over the last year, also in line with WTI, which has been in the $70 - $85 range. As a starting point, we can infer that the valuations of the companies have been commensurate with the movements in the underlying oil price deck and in line with where the equities should trade in the cycle historically over the last couple of years. Typically, in the commodities cycle, higher prices are usually coupled with lower multiples as market participants will usually price in lower normalized prices and vice versa, so a cause of concern would be if valuation starts trending towards the 6.5x – 7.0x+ area if oil prices continue to stay in the upper bounds of the $70 - $90 range or higher.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: